Écrit par Stephanie Day and Jackson Spencer
Info-éclair sur les recours collectifs
On February 25, 2025, British Columbia introduced Bill 4, proposing significant amendments to the Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act (BPCPA). Bill 4 passed second reading on March 3, 2025. If enacted as proposed, the legislation would prohibit dispute resolution clauses and class action waiver clauses in consumer contracts.
If enacted, Bill 4 will prohibit suppliers from including terms in consumer contracts that prevent consumers from commencing or becoming a class member of a class proceeding relating to a matter arising out of the consumer transaction (Section 14.3). Similarly, clauses that require a consumer to submit any dispute arising out of the consumer contract to arbitration or alternate dispute resolution processes before a dispute arises will be deemed void. This prohibition will also apply to “low value claims” in non-consumer contracts, a new concept for claims less than an amount to be prescribed in future regulations. Dispute resolution or class action waiver clauses agreed to before a dispute arising in such claims will be inoperative (Section 14.4).
These features of Bill 4 are retrospective and would apply to contracts entered into before, on, or after the act comes into force. Bill 4 would also make it an offence to contravene either section.
If passed, Bill 4 will align British Columbia with other provinces including Ontario, Quebec, Alberta and Saskatchewan. The expansion to low-value claims in non-consumer contracts goes beyond the approach taken in those provinces. The Class Actions Quick Takes Blog will continue to track Bill 4’s progress through Parliament.
Have time to read more?
- Bill 4 defines “consumer contracts” to mean all contracts relating to a “consumer transaction.” The definition relies on the existing definition for a “consumer transaction” under the BPCPA, meaning the “supply of goods or services or real property by a supplier to a consumer for purposes that are primarily personal, family, or household.”
- Bennett Jones has written recently about the enforceability of arbitration clauses generally, and the test for obtaining a stay of a court proceeding in favour of having an arbitral tribunal decide questions of jurisdiction.
Traduction alimentée par l’IA.
Veuillez noter que cette publication présente un aperçu des tendances juridiques notables et des mises à jour connexes. Elle est fournie à titre informatif seulement et ne saurait remplacer un conseil juridique personnalisé. Si vous avez besoin de conseils adaptés à votre propre situation, veuillez communiquer avec l’un des auteurs pour savoir comment nous pouvons vous aider à gérer vos besoins juridiques.
Pour obtenir l’autorisation de republier la présente publication ou toute autre publication, veuillez communiquer avec Amrita Kochhar à kochhara@bennettjones.com.
Bennett Jones