People

Services

Industries

Firm

About

Knowledge

Careers

News

Events

Contact

Connect

Privacy Policy

Manage Cookies

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Accessibility

Payments

Legal

Calgary

Toronto

Edmonton

Ottawa

Vancouver

New York

Montréal

Gary S.A. Solway

Technology, Media & Corporate Lawyer | Governance

Partner

Lisa Kakoske

Corporate and Securities Lawyer

Bruce A. Hibbard

Corporate & Securities Lawyer | M&A

Partner 

Incorporation Forum Shopping in Canada: Considerations for Canadian Tech Startups, is a comprehensive guide designed to help Canadian technology startups navigate the complexities of choosing the right jurisdiction for incorporation.

Incorporation Forum Shopping in Canada Considerations for Canadian Tech Startups

Incorporation Forum Shopping in Canada: Considerations for Canadian Tech Startups

William S. Osler KC

Capital Markets, Securities, M&A and Corporate Governance Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Valeria Palacio

Corporate Lawyer | Securities Transactions

Associate

As an update to our previous blog posts, <a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://bennettjones.com/Blogs-Section/Greater-Flexibility-for-Reporting-Issuers-Access-Equals-Delivery" target="_blank">Greater Flexibility for Reporting Issuers: Access Equals Delivery</a> and <a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.bennettjones.com/Blogs-Section/CSA-Seeks-Comments-on-Access-Equals-Delivery-Model-for-Prospectuses-Financial-Statements-and-MDA" target="_blank">CSA Seeks Comments on “Access Equals Delivery” Model for Prospectuses, Financial Statements and MD&A</a>, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) have published for comments a revised access model for certain continuous disclosure documents (CD Documents) of non-investment fund reporting issuers (Proposed Access Model). The Proposed Access Model is subject to a 90-day comment period, ending on February 17, 2025.

CSA Seeks Comments on Proposed Access Model Modernized Approach for Delivery

CSA Seeks Comments on Proposed Access Model: Modernized Approach for Delivery of Continuous Disclosure Documents

Andrew N. Disipio

Mining & Corporate Finance Lawyer | M&A, Equity & Debt Deals

On January 11, 2024, the Canadian Securities Administration published amendments implementing an "Access Equals Delivery" model to generally permit electronic delivery of prospectuses in Canada for non-investment fund reporting issuers, including venture issuers. The AED Model will come into force on April 16, 2024, subject to receiving expected regulatory and ministerial approvals.

Greater Flexibility for Reporting Issuers Access Equals Delivery

Greater Flexibility for Reporting Issuers: Access Equals Delivery

Kristopher R. Hanc

M&A and Capital Markets Lawyer

Glass, Lewis & Co and Institutional Shareholder Services have both released updates to their Canadian proxy voting guidelines for the 2023 proxy season, with the most significant changes relating to board diversity, environmental and climate related matters and executive compensation.. Recommendations from proxy advisory firms can have a significant impact on the outcome of business conducted at shareholder meetings—especially if institutional investors comprise a significant portion of the company's shareholder base. Canadian public companies should review the updates with their legal counsel to determine the impact on disclosure and governance practices, and take steps to mitigate any potential adverse voting recommendations.

ISS and Glass Lewis Update 2023 Proxy Voting Guidelines

Akhila Sandhu

Summer Student

Morgan Sutherland

Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Associate 

Michael C. Smith

Litigation Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

The United Nations has adopted the first global regulatory framework for Automated Driving Systems, establishing safety, cybersecurity, testing and monitoring requirements for Level 3, 4 and 5 automated vehicles. This article examines the framework&rsquo;s implications for Canada, including how Transport Canada may incorporate the requirements into domestic vehicle safety standards and what manufacturers and suppliers should consider as regulation evolves.

First Global Regulatory Framework For Autonomous Vehicles

First Global Regulatory Framework For Autonomous Vehicles: Key Takeaways For Canada And The Auto Industry

Ethan Z. Schiff

Class Actions & Commercial Litigation Lawyer

The Supreme Court of Canada&rsquo;s decision in SS&amp;C Technologies Canada Corporation v. Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, 2026 SCC 29, revisits the doctrine of spoliation and confirms that courts must draw an adverse inference when intentional destruction of relevant evidence is established. The decision provides guidance on the test for spoliation, the scope of mandatory adverse inferences and the importance of preserving evidence during litigation.

The Supreme Court of Canada Affirms Mandatory Adverse Inference in Cases of Spoliation

The Supreme Court of Canada Affirms Mandatory Adverse Inference for Spoliation

Dominique T. Hussey

Chief Executive Officer and Intellectual Property Litigator, Pharma/Biotech and Trademark Lawyer

Chief Executive Officer

Vincent M. de Grandpré

IP Lawyer | Life Sciences & Tech

Emily P. Kettel

Intellectual Property Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Partner, Trademark Agent

In Pharmascience v. Janssen Inc., the Supreme Court of Canada reaffirmed that methods of medical treatment remain unpatentable subject matter under the Patent Act because they are directed to the professional skill and judgment of healthcare practitioners. At the same time, the Court upheld the patentability of the dosing regimen claims at issue, clarifying that not all therapeutic or treatment-related claims constitute unpatentable methods of medical treatment. The decision provides important guidance on assessing patent eligibility for pharmaceutical and life sciences innovations in Canada.

Supreme Court of Canada Reaffirms that  Methods of Medical Treatment are Unpatentable

Supreme Court of Canada Confirms That Medical Professional Skill and Judgment Are Excluded From the Patent Bargain

Evana Yukanna

Commercial Litigation Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Ontario court denies a late class action opt-out request, reinforcing settlement finality and confirming prejudice can arise before court approval.

Ontario Court Reinforces Finality of Class Proceedings in Rejecting Late Opt Out Request

Ontario Court Reinforces Finality of Class Proceedings in Rejecting Late Opt-Out Request

Martin Ignasiak KC

Energy & Industrial Projects Lawyer

Head of Energy Regulatory

Tyler McDonough

Commercial Litigation Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Logan Lazurko

Energy & Regulatory Lawyer | Environmental

On June 17, 2026, the Alberta Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed an appeal by Fort McMurray 468 First Nation challenging an Alberta Energy Regulator decision that the First Nation lacked standing to request regulatory appeals of approvals issued to AdhMor Ltd. for an oilfield waste management facility near Fort McMurray. The decision in Fort McMurray 468 First Nation v Alberta Energy Regulator, 2026 ABCA 197, offers important guidance on what it takes to get in the door at the AER.

Alberta Court of Appeal Confirms Cumulative Effects are no Substitute for Evidence

No Standing Without Specifics: Alberta Court of Appeal Confirms that Cumulative Effects are no Substitute for Evidence

Title Alphabetical

Title

normal

Martin Kratz and Bruce Hibbard in Lawyers Weekly on Crowdfunding

From the Same Authors