In The News

Bennett Jones on Daniels v Canada in Mineral Law Newsletter

June 7, 2016
Social Media
Download
Download
Read Mode
Subscribe
Summarize

David Bursey, Shawn Munro, Mike Theroux, Laura Gill and Jennifer Asquin write on the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Daniels v. Canada in the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation's Mineral Law Newsletter. The unanimous Daniels judgment declared that non-status Indians and Métis are Indians for the purpose of section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867, and should be provided with the same level of access to federal programs and benefits available to status Indians.

Social Media
Download
Download
Subscribe
Republishing Requests

For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Erica Wirthlin at wirthline@bennettjones.com.

For informational purposes only

This publication provides an overview of legal trends and updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors.

Courts show Continued Commitment to Closely Scrutinizing Proposed Privacy Class Actions
Blog

Courts Continue Close Scrutiny of Privacy Class Actions

June 4, 2026
Nina ButzJackson Spencer
Nina Butz & Jackson Spencer
From First Price to Final Cost Drip Pricing Cases on the Rise
Blog

From First Price to Final Cost

June 4, 2026
Emrys DavisAna Nizharadze
Emrys Davis & Ana Nizharadze
Quasi Class Actions at the Competition Tribunal
Blog

Quasi-Class Actions at the Competition Tribunal

June 4, 2026
Emrys DavisLukas VanDusen
Emrys Davis & Lukas VanDusen