In The News

Bennett Jones on Daniels v Canada in Mineral Law Newsletter

June 7, 2016
Social Media
Download
Download
Read Mode
Subscribe
Summarize

David Bursey, Shawn Munro, Mike Theroux, Laura Gill and Jennifer Asquin write on the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Daniels v. Canada in the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation's Mineral Law Newsletter. The unanimous Daniels judgment declared that non-status Indians and Métis are Indians for the purpose of section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867, and should be provided with the same level of access to federal programs and benefits available to status Indians.

Social Media
Download
Download
Subscribe
Republishing Requests

For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Peter Zvanitajs at ZvanitajsP@bennettjones.com.

For informational purposes only

This publication provides an overview of legal trends and updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors.

Latest Insights

See All Insights
Expanded Federal Lobbyist Registration Requirements
Blog

Expanded Federal Lobbyist Registration Requirements

February 6, 2026
William S. Osler KCDrew C. BroughtonAudrix Arce
William S. Osler KC, Drew C. Broughton & Audrix Arce
Protecting Your Proprietary Information Lessons from SHAC Solutions Inc v Guenther
Blog

Protecting Your Proprietary Information: Lessons from SHAC Solutions Inc v Guenther

February 5, 2026
Edward (Ted) YooAhmed ElmallahJoshua Kim
Edward (Ted) Yoo, Ahmed Elmallah & Joshua Kim