People

Services

Industries

Firm

About

Knowledge

Careers

News

Events

Contact

Connect

Privacy Policy

Manage Cookies

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Accessibility

Payments

Legal

Calgary

Toronto

Edmonton

Ottawa

Vancouver

New York

Montréal

Michelle F. Yung

Real Estate Lawyer at Bennett Jones Vancouver

Partner

Luke Stretch

Commercial Real Estate Lawyer

Associate

Nathalie Hunter Heighington

Associate at Bennett Jones Vancouver

In Convocation Flowers Incorporated v. Anisa Holdings Ltd., 2026 ONCA 145, the Ontario Court of Appeal held that a landlord&rsquo;s interference with essential common area access&mdash;specifically loading dock facilities&mdash;can constitute a repudiatory breach of a commercial lease. The Court emphasized that even broadly drafted landlord discretion clauses cannot be exercised in a way that defeats a tenant&rsquo;s core operational use of the premises. The decision reinforces that courts will assess lease performance in practical, commercial terms when determining whether a fundamental breach has occurred.

Repudiation by Denied Access

Convocation Flowers Incorporated v. Anisa Holdings Ltd., 2026 ONCA 145

Repudiation by Denied Access: ONCA Confirms Loss of Essential Common Area Access May Be Repudiatory Breach of Lease

Samantha Lush

Corporate Commercial Lawyer at Bennett Jones Calgary

Alixe A.L. Cameron

Kateryna Korneliuk

Articling Student at Bennett Jones in Calgary

Articling Student  

Mortgage agreements in Alberta commonly include waivers of Sections 49 and 52 of the Expropriation Act, which can significantly alter how compensation is allocated when land is expropriated. These clauses may shift financial risk from lenders to borrowers and affect entitlement to market value-based compensation and disturbance payments. This blog examines the legal enforceability of such waivers and highlights the importance of clear drafting and independent legal advice.

Drafting Cautiously Waiving Statutory Protections

Sections 49 and 52 of Alberta's Expropriation Act in Mortgage Agreements

Drafting Cautiously: Waiving Statutory Protections 

Daniel (Dan) R. Chubb

Corporate Commercial Lawyer at Bennett Jones Edmonton

Joan Bilsland

Knowledge Management Research Lawyer

Canadian courts generally treat real estate deposits as forfeitable upon a purchaser&rsquo;s default, distinct from unenforceable penalty clauses. However, under the Redstone factors, courts may grant relief from forfeiture where a deposit is grossly disproportionate to the vendor&rsquo;s damages or where retaining it would be unconscionable in the circumstances.

When A Deposit Becomes A Penalty

When a Deposit Becomes a Penalty: Relief From Forfeiture in Real Estate Transactions

Natalia E. Iamundo

Commercial Real Estate Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Troy Mack

Rights of first refusal and rights of first offer are often used interchangeably, but they carry very different legal consequences in Alberta land transactions. This post explains how Alberta legislation and case law treat each right, why only a ROFR can support a caveat, and what parties should consider when structuring agreements to protect their interests.

Right of First Refusal vs Right of First Offer in Alberta Land Transactions

Right of First Refusal vs. Right of First Offer in Alberta Land Transactions 

Katherine Booth

Litigation Lawyer at Bennett Jones Vancouver

The BC Court of Appeal in Cleaver v. The Cadillac Fairview Corporation Limited upheld the refusal to certify a privacy class action, finding no basis in fact for the claim&rsquo;s central allegation. The decision reinforces the courts&rsquo; gatekeeping role at certification and the importance of evidentiary support for the core allegations underlying a proposed class proceeding.

BC Court of Appeal No basis in fact no class action

BC Court of Appeal: No Basis in Fact = No Class Action 

Michael C. Smith

Litigation Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

George W. H. Reid

International Trade, Investment and Public Procurement Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

The Government of Canada has published a new Notice concerning the rules and procedures governing the administration of the quota for imports of electric vehicles from the People's Republic of China for the second period of Quota Year 1 (September 1, 2026 to February 28, 2027). The Notice, issued by Global Affairs Canada under the Export and Import Permits Act, confirms that the second allocation period will continue to operate similar to the first allocation period.&nbsp;

Notice Concerning the Quota for Imports of Chinese Electric Vehicles

Second Allocation Period Opens September 1, 2026

Edwin G. Kroft KC

Tax Litigation Lawyer at Bennett Jones

Kate Kim

Andrew Young

Tax Lawyer at Bennett Jones Vancouver

Issue 43 of Bennett Jones on Tax Disputes highlights recent developments in Canadian tax litigation and dispute resolution. This edition examines the limits of the Minister's ability to advance alternative assessment arguments, clarifies who may deduct legal costs incurred in tax disputes, and explores the role of price adjustment clauses in estate freeze transactions

Bennett Jones on Tax Disputes Issue 43

Bennett Jones on Tax Disputes: August 2026

Carl Cunningham

Management-side Employment Lawyer

David Cassin

Employment Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

Julia Horowitz

Lawyer at Bennett Jones Toronto

In Wigdor v. Facebook Canada Ltd., 2026 ONCA 572, the Ontario Court of Appeal clarified that equity-based compensation, including RSUs, may constitute a term or condition of employment that must be preserved during the statutory notice period under the Employment Standards Act, 2000. The decision highlights the need for employers to carefully review RSU forfeiture provisions and saving language to ensure compliance with employment standards legislation, while confirming that the threshold for punitive damages remains high.

RSU Forfeiture Revisited Ontario Court of Appeal Provides Important Guidance for Employers

RSU Forfeiture Revisited: Ontario Court of Appeal Provides Important Guidance for Employers

Alison G. FitzGerald

International Arbitration Lawyer

Sabrina A. Bandali

International Trade, Regulatory and Investment Lawyer

Canada has introduced a new round of retaliatory tariffs on $27.6 billion worth of US goods in response to the Trump administration's 50% tariffs on Canadian exports. The measures, effective September 8, 2026, include surtaxes ranging from 15% to 50% on a wide range of products, alongside remission programs and duty relief mechanisms for affected businesses.

G2S2 Capital Acquires Landmark First Canadian Centre in Downtown Calgary

From the Same Authors