Article

Ontario Court of Appeal Considers the Law Regarding Penalty Clauses

January 1, 2008
Social Media
Download
Download
Read Mode
Subscribe
Summarize
Co-authored by Christiaan A. Jordaan. (2008) 13:1 Commercial Litigation 684. Courts have historically shown reluctance to enforce contractual clauses that impose particularly onerous consequences on a party that breaches the contract. Two different streams of jurisprudence developed to address this issue: common law courts developed the "penalty" doctrine, while courts of equity developed the doctrine of relief from forfeiture. While closely related, the two doctrines would not necessarily lead to the same result in similar circumstances. Two recent decisions of the Ontario Court of Appeal suggest the possibility of a harmonization of these doctrines in a manner that would create greater predictability in the law and would better respect freedom of contract.
Social Media
Download
Download
Subscribe
Republishing Requests

For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Amrita Kochhar at kochhara@bennettjones.com.

For informational purposes only

This publication provides an overview of legal trends and updates for informational purposes only. For personalized legal advice, please contact the authors.

Latest Insights

See All Insights
Canadas Q3 2025 MA Landscape
Blog

Canada's Q3 2025 M&A Landscape

October 16, 2025
Kwang LimAngela BlakeLaura James
Kwang Lim, Angela Blake & Laura James
The Implications of AI on Performance Marketing
Blog

The Implications of AI on Performance Marketing

October 9, 2025
Benjamin K. ReingoldStephen D. Burns
Benjamin K. Reingold & Stephen D. Burns