• About
  • Offices
  • Careers
  • News
  • Students
  • Alumni
  • Payments
  • EN | FR
Background Image
Bennett Jones Logo
  • People
  • Expertise
  • Knowledge
  • Search
  • FR Menu
  • Search Mobile
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
View all
Practices
Corporate Litigation Regulatory Tax View all
Industries
Energy Infrastructure Mining Private Equity & Investment Funds View all
Advisory
Crisis & Risk Management Public Policy
View Client Work
International Experience
Insights News Events Subscribe
Arbitration Angle Artificial Intelligence Insights Business Law Talks Podcast Class Actions: Looking Forward Class Action Quick Takes
Economic Outlook New Energy Economy Series Quarterly Fintech Insights Quarterly M&A Insights Sustainability & the CIO
People
Offices
About
Practices
Industries
Advisory Services
Client Work
Insights
News
Events
Careers
Law Students
Alumni
Payments
Search
Subscribe

Stay informed on the latest business and legal insights and events.

LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Vimeo Vimeo
 
Blog

BC Court Holds That Non-Parties Required to Respond to Document Production Applications are Not Entitled to Full Indemnification of their Legal Costs

February 06, 2025

Written By Emma Arnold-Fyfe

Stay Up-To-Date

Read the most recent Class Action Quick Takes and stay informed with the latest key developments, trends and strategies in the class action arena by subscribing to receive future insights.

Read the latest
Subscribe

In Bowman v Kimberly-Clark Corporation, 2024 BCSC 1975, the British Columbia Supreme Court held that non-parties are entitled to tariff costs for responding to document production applications—but are not entitled to full indemnity costs. The plaintiff had initially sought records from various non-party retailers but abandoned the application after oral argument.

The non-party retailers sought to recover their “reasonable legal expenses and disbursements of responding to the application.” In the normal course, the court can award costs on the basic, common scale of tariff costs as calculated under the Supreme Court Civil Rules or, as requested by the non-party retailers, to award costs on a full indemnity basis. Costs awarded on the tariff scale are usually less than the actual amount of legal fees incurred.

Notably, the restrictions on costs in Section 37 of the Class Proceedings Act do not apply to non-parties to the certification application or certified class proceeding. The Court held that a costs award was appropriate here as the non-party retailers had suffered the expense and inconvenience of responding to the plaintiff’s application. The Court, however, declined to deviate from the usual rule of tariff costs. Accordingly, the non-party retailers were awarded their costs at Scale B as per the Supreme Court Civil Rules.

Have time to read more?

  • The Court confirmed that non-parties are in a special circumstance related to litigation but are “participants in democracies governed by the rule of law,” and that they have a duty to “cooperate in the effective resolution of legal disputes between other citizens.”
  • In deciding the appropriate costs award was tariff costs, the court relied heavily on the reasons of A.L. Sott Financial (Newton) Ltd. v Bauman, which canvasses the jurisprudence pertaining to costs orders where applications involve non-parties.

Please note that this publication presents an overview of notable legal trends and related updates. It is intended for informational purposes and not as a replacement for detailed legal advice. If you need guidance tailored to your specific circumstances, please contact one of the authors to explore how we can help you navigate your legal needs.

For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Amrita Kochhar at kochhara@bennettjones.com.

Download PDF

Author

  • Emma  Arnold-Fyfe Emma Arnold-Fyfe, Associate

Related Links

  • Insights
  • Media
  • Subscribe

Recent Posts

Blog

BC Government Streamlines Renewable Energy Regulatory [...]

May 09, 2025
       

Blog

BBHIC 2025: Key Insights From Canada’s Leading Healthcare [...]

May 08, 2025
       

Blog

Upending the Ground Rules: Proposed Major Overhaul [...]

May 08, 2025
       

Blog

Government of Alberta Proposes Significant Changes [...]

May 06, 2025
       

Blog

What Does the SPAC IPO Rebound Mean for Cross-Border Deals?

May 05, 2025
       
Bennett Jones Centennial Footer
Bennett Jones Centennial Footer
About
  • Leadership
  • Diversity
  • Community
  • Innovation
  • Security
Offices
  • Calgary
  • Edmonton
  • Montréal
  • Ottawa
  • Toronto
  • Vancouver
  • New York
Connect
  • Insights
  • News
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Students
  • Alumni
Subscribe

Stay informed on the latest business and legal insights and events.

LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Vimeo Vimeo
© Bennett Jones LLP 2025. All rights reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
Logo Bennett Jones